לְמִישְׁתָּא בֵּיהּ שִׁיכְרָא שַׁפִּיר דָּמֵי.

to drink beer with the proceeds seems well and is permitted. The seven representatives have the authority to annul the sanctity of the synagogue, and therefore the proceeds of its sale do not retain any sanctity.

רָבִינָא הֲוָה לֵיהּ הַהוּא תִּילָא דְּבֵי כְנִישְׁתָּא אֲתָא לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב אַשִׁי, אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַהוּ לְמִיזְרְעָהּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: זִיל זְבָנֵיהּ מִשִּׁבְעָה טוֹבֵי הָעִיר בְּמַעֲמַד אַנְשֵׁי הָעִיר, וּזְרָעָהּ.

The Gemara relates: Ravina had a certain piece of land on which stood a mound of the ruins of a synagogue. He came before Rav Ashi and said to him: What is the halakha with regard to sowing the land? He said to him: Go, purchase it from the seven representatives of the town in an assembly of the residents of the town, and then you may sow it.

רָמִי בַּר אַבָּא הֲוָה קָא בָּנֵי בֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא, הֲוָה הַהִיא כְנִישְׁתָּא עַתִּיקָא הֲוָה בָּעֵי לְמִיסְתְּרֵיהּ וּלְאַתּוּיֵי לִיבְנֵי וְכִשּׁוּרֵי מִינָּהּ, וְעַיּוּלֵי לְהָתָם. יָתֵיב וְקָא מִיבָּעֲיָא לֵיהּ הָא דְּרַב חִסְדָּא. דַּאֲמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: לָא לִיסְתּוֹר בֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא עַד דְּבָנֵי בֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא אַחֲרִיתִי, הָתָם – מִשּׁוּם פְּשִׁיעוּתָא, כִּי הַאי גַּוְונָא מַאי? אֲתָא לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב פַּפָּא – וְאָסַר לֵיהּ, לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב הוּנָא – וְאֲסַר לֵיהּ.

Rami bar Abba was once building a synagogue. There was a certain old synagogue that he wished to demolish, and bring bricks and beams from it, and bring them to there, to construct a new synagogue. He sat and considered that which Rav Ḥisda said, as Rav Ḥisda said: One should not demolish a synagogue until one has built another synagogue. Rami bar Abba reasoned that Rav Ḥisda’s ruling there is due to a concern of negligence, as perhaps after the first synagogue is demolished, people will be negligent and a new one will never be built. However, in a case like this, where the new synagogue is to be built directly from the materials of the old one, what is the halakha ? He came before Rav Pappa to ask his opinion, and he prohibited him from doing so. He then came before Rav Huna, and he also prohibited him from doing so.

אֲמַר רָבָא: הַאי בֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא, חִלּוּפָהּ וְזַבּוּנָהּ – שָׁרֵי, אוֹגוּרָהּ וּמַשְׁכּוּנָהּ – אָסוּר. מַאי טַעְמָא – בִּקְדוּשָּׁתָהּ קָאֵי.

Rava said: With regard to this synagogue, exchanging it for a different building or selling it for money is permitted, but renting it out or mortgaging it is prohibited. What is the reason for this? When a synagogue is rented out or mortgaged, it remains in its sacred state. Therefore, it is prohibited to rent it out or mortgage it, because it will then be used for a non-sacred purpose. However, if it is exchanged or sold, its sanctity is transferred to the other building or to the proceeds of the sale, and therefore the old synagogue building may be used for any purpose.

לִיבְנֵי נַמִי, חַלּוּפִינְהוּ וְזִבּוּנִינְהוּ – שָׁרֵי, אוֹזוֹפִינְהוּ – אָסוּר. הָנֵי מִילֵּי – בְּעַתִּיקָתָא, אֲבָל בַּחֲדָתָא – לֵית לָן בָּהּ.

The same halakha is also true of the bricks of a synagogue; exchanging them or selling them is permitted, but renting them out is prohibited. The Gemara comments: This applies to old bricks that have already been part of a synagogue, but as for new bricks that have only been designated to be used in a synagogue, we have no problem with it if they are rented out for a non-sacred purpose.

וַאֲפִילּוּ לְמַאן דְּאָמַר הַזְמָנָה מִילְּתָא הִיא – הָנֵי מִילֵּי כְּגוֹן הָאוֹרֵג בֶּגֶד לְמֵת, אֲבָל הָכָא כְּטָווּי לְאָרִיג דָּמִי, וְלֵיכָּא לְמַאן דְּאָמַר.

And even according to the one who said that mere designation is significant, i.e., although a certain object was not yet used for the designated purpose, the halakhic ramifications of using it for that purpose already take hold, this applies only in a case where it was created from the outset for that purpose, for example, one who weaves a garment to be used as shrouds for a corpse. However, here the bricks are comparable to already spun thread that was then designated to be used to weave burial shrouds. Concerning such designation, where nothing was specifically created for the designated purpose, there is no one who said that the designation is significant.

מַתָּנָה, פְּלִיגִי בָּהּ רַב אַחָא וְרָבִינָא, חַד אֲסַר וְחַד שָׁרֵי. מַאן דַּאֲסַר בְּהַאי תִּפְקַע קְדוּשָּׁתָהּ? וּמַאן דְּשָׁרֵי: אִי לָאו דַּהֲוָה לֵיהּ הֲנָאָה מִינֵּיהּ – לָא הֲוָה יָהֵיב לֵיהּ, הָדַר הֲוָה לֵיהּ מַתָּנָה כִּזְבִינֵי.

Rav Aḥa and Ravina disagree about whether it is permitted to give away a synagogue as a gift to then be used for a non-sacred purpose. One of them prohibited it, and the other one permitted it. The one who prohibits it says: Is it possible that with this act of giving alone its sanctity is removed? This cannot be the case. Since the synagogue was not exchanged for anything else, there is nothing to which the sanctity may be transferred. Consequently, the synagogue remains sacred. And the one who permitted it does so because he reasons that if the donor did not receive any benefit from giving the synagogue, he would not have given it. Therefore, the gift has reverted to being like a sale, and the sanctity is transferred to the benefit received.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: תַּשְׁמִישֵׁי מִצְוָה – נִזְרָקִין, תַּשְׁמִישֵׁי קְדוּשָּׁה – נִגְנָזִין. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן תַּשְׁמִישֵׁי מִצְוָה: סוּכָּה, לוּלָב, שׁוֹפָר, צִיצִית. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן תַּשְׁמִישֵׁי קְדוּשָּׁה: דְּלוּסְקְמֵי סְפָרִים, תְּפִילִּין וּמְזוּזוֹת, וְתִיק שֶׁל סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה, וְנַרְתִּיק שֶׁל תְּפִילִּין וּרְצוּעוֹתֵיהֶן.

§ The Sages taught in a baraita : Articles used in the performance of a mitzva may be thrown out after use. articles associated with the sanctity of God’s name, must be interred in a respectful manner. And these items are considered articles of a mitzva: A sukka ; a lulav ; a shofar ; and ritual fringes. And these items are considered articles of sanctity: Cases of scrolls, i.e. of Torah scrolls; phylacteries; and mezuzot ; and a container for a Torah scroll; and a cover for phylacteries; and their straps.

אֲמַר רָבָא: מֵרֵישׁ הֲוָה אָמִינָא הַאי כּוּרְסַיָּא תַּשְׁמִישׁ דְּתַשְׁמִישׁ הוּא, וְשָׂרֵי. כֵּיוָן דְּחָזֵינָא דְּמוֹתְבִי עִלָּוֵיהּ סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה, אָמִינָא: תַּשְׁמִישׁ קְדוּשָּׁה הוּא, וְאָסוּר.

Rava said: Initially, I used to say that this lectern in the synagogue upon which the Torah is read is only an article of an article of sanctity, as the Torah scroll does not rest directly upon the lectern but rather upon the cloth that covers it. And the halakha is that once an article of an article of sanctity is no longer used, it is permitted to throw it out. However, once I saw that the Torah scroll is sometimes placed directly upon the lectern without an intervening cloth. I said that it is an article used directly for items of sanctity, and as such it is prohibited to simply discard it after use.

וַאֲמַר רָבָא: מֵרֵישׁ הֲוָה אָמִינָא הַאי פְּרִיסָא תַּשְׁמִישׁ דְּתַשְׁמִישׁ הוּא, כֵּיוָן דְּחָזֵינָא דְּעָיְיפִי לֵיהּ וּמַנְחִי סִיפְרָא עִלָּוֵיהּ אָמִינָא: תַּשְׁמִישׁ קְדוּשָּׁה הוּא, וְאָסוּר.

And Rava similarly said: Initially, I used to say that this curtain, which is placed at the opening to the ark as a decoration, is only an article of an article of sanctity, as it serves to beautify the ark but is not directly used for the Torah scroll. However, once I saw that sometimes the curtain is folded over and a Torah scroll is placed upon it. I said that it is an article used directly for items of sanctity and as such it is prohibited to simply discard it after use.

וַאֲמַר רָבָא: הַאי תֵּיבוּתָא דְּאִירְפָּט, מֵיעָבְדָה תֵּיבָה זוּטַרְתִּי – שָׁרֵי, כּוּרְסַיָּיא – אֲסִיר. וַאֲמַר רָבָא: הַאי פְּרִיסָא דְּבָלָה, לְמֵיעָבְדֵיהּ פְּרִיסָא לְסִפְרֵי – שָׁרֵי, לְחוּמָּשִׁין – אָסִיר.

And Rava further said: With regard to this ark that has fallen apart, constructing a smaller ark from its materials is permitted, as both have the same level of sanctity, but to use the materials to construct a lectern is prohibited because the lectern has a lesser degree of sanctity. And Rava similarly said: With regard to this curtain used to decorate an ark that has become worn out, to fashion it into a wrapping cloth for Torah scrolls is permitted, but to fashion it into a wrapping cloth for a scroll of one of the five books of the Torah is prohibited.

וַאֲמַר רָבָא: הָנֵי זְבִילִי דְּחוּמָּשֵׁי, וְקַמְטָרֵי דְּסִפְרֵי – תַּשְׁמִישׁ קְדוּשָּׁה נִינְהוּ, וְנִגְנָזִין. פְּשִׁיטָא! מַהוּ דְּתֵימָא: הָנֵי לָאו לְכָבוֹד עֲבִידָן, לְנַטּוּרֵי בְּעָלְמָא עֲבִידִי, קָא מַשְׁמַע לָן.

And Rava also said: With regard to these cases for storing scrolls of one of the five books of the Torah and sacks for storing Torah scrolls, they are classified as articles of sanctity. Therefore, they are to be interred when they are no longer in use. The Gemara asks: Isn’t that obvious? The Gemara answers: Lest you say that since these items are not made for the honor of the scrolls but rather are made merely to provide protection, they should not be classified as articles of sanctity, Rava therefore teaches us that although they are indeed made to protect the scrolls, they also provide honor and are therefore to be classified as articles of sanctity.

הַהוּא בֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא דִּיהוּדָאֵי רוֹמָאֵי דַּהֲוָה פְּתִיחַ לְהַהוּא אִידְרוֹנָא, דַּהֲוָה מָחֵית בֵּיהּ מֵת, וְהָווּ בָּעוּ כָּהֲנִי לְמֵיעַל לְצַלּוּיֵי הָתָם. אָתוּ אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ לְרָבָא, אֲמַר לְהוּ: דְּלוּ תֵּיבוּתָא, אוֹתְבוּהָּ, דַּהֲוָה לֵיהּ כְּלִי עֵץ הֶעָשׂוּי לְנַחַת, וּכְלִי עֵץ הֶעָשׂוּי לְנַחַת – אֵינוֹ מְקַבֵּל טוּמְאָה, וְחוֹצֵץ בִּפְנֵי הַטּוּמְאָה.

The Gemara relates: There was a certain synagogue of the Jews of Rome that opened out into a room in which a corpse was lying, thereby spreading the ritual impurity of the corpse throughout the synagogue. And the priests wished to enter the synagogue in order to pray there. However, it was prohibited for them to do so because a priest may not come in contact with ritual impurity of a corpse. They came and spoke to Rava, about what to do. He said to them: Lift up the ark and put it down in the opening between the two rooms, as it is a wooden utensil that is designated to rest in one place and not be moved from there, and the halakha is that a wooden utensil that is designated to rest is not susceptible to ritual impurity, and therefore it serves as a barrier to prevent ritual impurity from spreading.

אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ רַבָּנַן לְרָבָא: וְהָא זִמְנִין דִּמְטַלְטְלִי לֵיהּ כִּי מָנַח סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה עִלָּוֵיהּ, וַהֲוָה לֵיהּ מִיטַּלְטְלָא מָלֵא וְרֵיקָם! אִי הָכִי לָא אֶפְשָׁר.

The Rabbis said to Rava: But isn’t the ark sometimes moved when a Torah scroll is still resting inside it, and therefore it is a utensil that is moved both when it is full and when it is empty; such a utensil is susceptible to ritual impurity and cannot prevent ritual impurity from spreading. He said to them: If so, if it is as you claim, then it is not possible to remedy the situation.

אָמַר מַר זוּטְרָא: מִטְפְּחוֹת סְפָרִים שֶׁבָּלוּ עוֹשִׂין אוֹתָן תַּכְרִיכִין לְמֵת מִצְוָה, וְזוֹ הִיא גְּנִיזָתָן.

Mar Zutra said: With regard to wrapping cloths of Torah scrolls that have become worn out, they may be made into shrouds for a corpse with no one to bury it [ met mitzva ], and this is their most appropriate manner for being interred.

וְאָמַר רָבָא: סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה שֶׁבָּלָה גּוֹנְזִין אוֹתוֹ אֵצֶל תַּלְמִיד חָכָם, וַאֲפִילּוּ שׁוֹנֶה הֲלָכוֹת. אָמַר רַב אַחָא בַּר יַעֲקֹב: וּבִכְלֵי חֶרֶס, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר ״וּנְתַתֶּם בִּכְלִי חֶרֶשׂ לְמַעַן יַעַמְדוּ יָמִים רַבִּים״,

And Rava said: A Torah scroll that became worn out is interred and buried next to a Torah scholar, and in this regard, a Torah scholar is defined even as one who only studies the halakhot in the Mishna and the baraitot but is not proficient in their analysis. Rav Aḥa bar Ya’akov said: And when it is buried, it is first placed in an earthenware vessel, as it is stated: “And put them in an earthenware vessel, that they may last for many days” (Jeremiah 32:14).

(וַאֲמַר) רַב פַּפִּי מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּרָבָא: מִבֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא לְבֵי רַבָּנַן – שָׁרֵי, מִבֵּי רַבָּנַן לְבֵּי כְנִישְׁתָּא – אֲסִיר. וְרַב פַּפָּא מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּרָבָא מַתְנֵי אִיפְּכָא, אָמַר רַב אַחָא:

§ And Rav Pappi said in the name of Rava: To convert a building from a synagogue into a study hall is permitted, but from a study hall into a synagogue is prohibited, as he holds that a study hall has a higher degree of sanctity than a synagogue. And Rav Pappa in the name of Rava teaches the opposite, as he holds that a synagogue has a higher degree of sanctity than a study hall. Rav Aḥa said: