מוּתָּרוֹת, יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁהֵבִיא אֲבָנִים מִן הַמַּרְקוּלִיס וְחִיפָּה בָּהֶן דְּרָכִים וּסְרַטֵיאוֹת – אֲסוּרוֹת; וְלֵית נַגָּר וְלָא בַּר נַגָּר דִּיפָרְקִינָהּ.

they are permitted, as the gentile nullified their prohibited status. In the case of a Jew who brought stones from a pile dedicated to Mercury and paved paths and streets with them, they are prohibited. And there is neither a carpenter [ naggar ] nor a son of a carpenter who can resolve this, i.e., no one can resolve the difficulty inherent in this statement, not a Torah scholar, and not even a scholar who is the son of a scholar.

אֲמַר רַב שֵׁשֶׁת: אֲנָא לָא נַגָּר אֲנָא וְלָא בַּר נַגָּר אֲנָא, וּפָרֵיקְנָא לֵיהּ: מַאי קוּשְׁיָא לֵיהּ? דְּרַב גִּידֵּל – בָּעֵינָא כְּעֵין פְּנִים וְלֵיכָּא.

Rav Sheshet said: As for me, I am not a carpenter, nor am I the son of a carpenter, and yet I will resolve the difficulty. What is the difficulty that Rabba bar Yirmeya finds in the baraita ? The baraita is difficult because of the statement of Rav Giddel, that the prohibited status of offerings brought in idol worship can never be revoked. This is not difficult, as in order for idol worship to prohibit an offering I require the offering to be like those offerings sacrificed inside the Temple, and there is no a parallel offering of stones in the Temple.

אֲמַר רַב יוֹסֵף בַּר אַבָּא: אִיקְלַע רַבָּה בַּר יִרְמְיָה לְאַתְרִין, וַאֲתָא וְאַיְיתֵי מַתְנִיתָא בִּידֵיהּ: מַתְלִיעִין וּמְזַהֲמִין בַּשְּׁבִיעִית, וְאֵין מַתְלִיעִין וּמְזַהֲמִין בַּמּוֹעֵד,

§ Rav Yosef bar Abba said: Rabba bar Yirmeya happened to come to our locale, and when he came he brought the following baraita with him: One may remove worms from a tree and place manure on a cut in a tree during the Sabbatical Year, but one may not remove worms or place manure on a cut during the intermediate days of the Festival.

כָּאן וְכָאן אֵין מְגַזְּמִין, וְסָכִין שֶׁמֶן לַגִּזּוּם בֵּין בַּמּוֹעֵד בֵּין בַּשְּׁבִיעִית; וְלֵית נַגָּר וְלָא בַּר נַגָּר דִּיפָרְקִינָהּ.

The baraita continues: Both here, in the case of the Sabbatical Year, and there, in the case of the intermediate days of the Festival, one may not prune the trees. But one may smear oil on the previously pruned tree on the place where one pruned it in order to prevent the tree from being damaged, both during the intermediate days of the Festival and during the Sabbatical Year. And there is neither a carpenter nor a son of a carpenter who can resolve this.

אֲמַר רָבִינָא: אֲנָא לָא נַגָּר אֲנָא וְלָא בַּר נַגָּר אֲנָא, וּמְפָרְקִינָא לָהּ: מַאי קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ? אִילֵימָא מוֹעֵד אַשְּׁבִיעִית קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ: מַאי שְׁנָא שְׁבִיעִית דְּשָׁרֵי, וּמַאי שְׁנָא מוֹעֵד דְּאָסוּר? מִי דָּמֵי? שְׁבִיעִית – מְלָאכָה אָסַר רַחֲמָנָא, טִירְחָא שָׁרֵי, מוֹעֵד – אֲפִילּוּ טִירְחָא נַמִי אָסוּר!

Ravina said: As for me, I am not a carpenter, nor am I the son of a carpenter, and yet I will resolve the difficulty. What is the difficulty that Rabba bar Yirmeya finds in the baraita ? If we say that the difference between the intermediate days of the Festival and the Sabbatical Year poses a difficulty to him, this cannot be so. One cannot explain that Rabba bar Yirmeya is asking what is different about the Sabbatical Year that one is permitted to remove worms and place manure on a cut, and what is different about the intermediate days of the Festival that it is prohibited to do so, as this is not a valid question. Are they comparable? With regard to the Sabbatical Year, the Merciful One prohibited only agricultural labor, whereas other forms of exertion are permitted. With regard to the intermediate days of the Festival, even other forms of exertion are prohibited.

וְאֶלָּא זִיהוּם אַגִּיזּוּם קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ: מַאי שְׁנָא זִיהוּם דְּשָׁרֵי, וּמַאי שְׁנָא גִּיזּוּם דְּאָסוּר? מִי דָּמֵי? זִיהוּם אוֹקוֹמֵי אִילָנָא וְשָׁרֵי, גִּיזּוּם אַבְרוּיֵי אִילָנָא וְאָסוּר!

Ravina suggests: Rather, perhaps the difference between placing manure and pruning poses a difficulty to him. What is different about placing manure that it is permitted during the Sabbatical Year, and what is different about pruning that it is prohibited? Ravina rejects this suggestion: This is also not a valid question. Are they comparable? The purpose of placing manure is to preserve the tree, and therefore it is permitted, whereas the purpose of pruning is to enhance the tree, and therefore it is prohibited.

וְאֶלָּא זִיהוּם אַזִּיהוּם קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ, דְּקָתָנֵי: מַתְלִיעִין וּמְזַהֲמִין בַּשְּׁבִיעִית, וּרְמִינְהִי: מְזַהֲמִין אֶת הַנְּטִיעוֹת, וְכוֹרְכִין אוֹתָן, וְקוֹטְמִין אוֹתָן, וְעוֹשִׂין לָהֶם בָּתִּים, וּמַשְׁקִין אוֹתָן עַד רֹאשׁ הַשָּׁנָה; עַד רֹאשׁ הַשָּׁנָה אִין, בַּשְּׁבִיעִית לָא!

Ravina suggests: Rather, perhaps the contradiction between the aforementioned baraita with regard to placing manure and another mishna with regard to placing manure poses a difficulty to him, as the baraita teaches: One may remove worms from a tree and place manure on a cut in a tree during the Sabbatical Year. And one may raise a contradiction from a mishna ( Shevi’it 2:4): One may place manure on the saplings, and one may bind their branches to the trunk so that they grow upright. And one may lop off their tops to promote their growth, and make shelters for them to shield them from the sun, and water them. All these actions are permitted until Rosh HaShana of the Sabbatical Year. until Rosh HaShana, yes, one may place manure on the tree; but during the Sabbatical Year itself one may not do so.

וְדִלְמָא כִּדְרַב עוּקְבָא בַּר חָמָא, דְּאָמַר רַב עוּקְבָא בַּר חָמָא: תְּרֵי קִשְׁקוּשֵׁי הָווּ, חַד לְאַבְרוּיֵי אִילָנָא וְאָסוּר, וְחַד לְסַתּוּמֵי פִּילֵי וְשָׁרֵי; הָכִי נַמִי תְּרֵי זִיהֲמוּמֵי הָוֵי, חַד לְאוֹקוֹמֵי אִילָנֵי וְשָׁרֵי, וְחַד לְאַבְרוּיֵי אִילָנֵי וְאָסוּר!

Ravina rejects this suggestion: But perhaps one can account for the apparent contradiction in a similar fashion to the explanation of Rav Ukva bar Ḥama, as Rav Ukva bar Ḥama says: There are two types of hoeing [ kishkushei ]. The purpose of one type is to enhance the tree’s health, and it is therefore prohibited. And the purpose of one type is to close up cracks in the ground, which is permitted, as it is done only to prevent the trees from dying and not to enhance their growth. So too, one may suggest that there are two types of placing manure: One type whose purpose is to preserve the trees, and is therefore permitted, and one type whose purpose is to enhance the trees, and is therefore prohibited.

וְאֶלָּא סִיכָה אַסִּיכָה קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ, דְּקָתָנֵי: סָכִין שֶׁמֶן לַגִּזּוּם בֵּין בַּמּוֹעֵד וּבֵין בַּשְּׁבִיעִית; וּרְמִינְהִי: סָכִין אֶת הַפַּגִּין, וּמְנַקְּבִין וּמְפַטְּמִין אוֹתָן עַד רֹאשׁ הַשָּׁנָה; עַד רֹאשׁ הַשָּׁנָה אִין, בַּשְּׁבִיעִית לָא!

Ravina suggests: Rather, perhaps the contradiction between the halakha in the baraita with regard to smearing oil and the halakha in another mishna with regard to smearing oil poses a difficulty for him, as the baraita teaches: One may smear oil on the previously pruned tree, on the place where one pruned it, both during the intermediate days of the Festival and during the Sabbatical Year. And one may raise a contradiction from the mishna ( Shevi’it 2:5): One may smear oil on the unripe figs in the sixth year of the Sabbatical cycle in order to accelerate their ripening, and similarly one may pierce them and fill the cut with oil to facilitate their ripening until Rosh HaShana. One can infer that until Rosh HaShana, yes, one may smear; but during the Sabbatical Year itself one may not do so.

מִי דָּמֵי? הָכָא אוֹקוֹמֵי אִילָנָא וְשָׁרֵי, הָתָם פִּטּוּמֵי פֵּירָא וְאָסוּר!

Ravina rejects this suggestion: That is also not a valid question. Are they comparable? Here, the purpose of smearing oil on the place where the tree was pruned is to preserve the tree, and therefore it is permitted. There, the purpose of smearing oil on the unripe figs is to enhance and enlarge the fruit and is therefore prohibited.

אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַב סַמָּא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב אַשִׁי לְרָבִינָא: בַּר יִרְמְיָה, סִיכָה דְּמוֹעֵד אַזִּיהוּם דְּמוֹעֵד קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיהּ: מִכְּדִי הַאי אוֹקוֹמֵי וְהַאי אוֹקוֹמֵי, מַאי שְׁנָא הַאי דְּשָׁרֵי, וּמַאי שְׁנָא הַאי דְּאָסוּר? הַיְינוּ דְּקָאָמַר לֵיהּ: לֵית נַגָּר וְלָא בַּר נַגָּר דִּיפָרְקִינָהּ.

Rav Samma, son of Rav Ashi, said to Ravina: The contradiction between the halakha with regard to smearing oil during the intermediate days of the Festival and the halakha with regard to placing manure during the intermediate days of the Festival poses a difficulty for Rabba bar Yirmeya. Since the purpose of this action is to preserve the tree, and the purpose of that action is to preserve the tree, what is different in this case that it is permitted, and what is different in that case that it is prohibited? This is the reason that Rabba bar Yirmeya said to him: There is neither a carpenter nor a son of a carpenter who can resolve this.

אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה שֶׁעוֹבְדִין אוֹתָהּ בְּמַקֵּל, שָׁבַר מַקֵּל בְּפָנֶיהָ – חַיָּיב, זָרַק מַקֵּל בְּפָנֶיהָ – פָּטוּר. אֲמַר לֵיהּ אַבַּיֵי לְרָבָא: מַאי שְׁנָא שָׁבַר? דַּהֲוָה לֵיהּ כְּעֵין זְבִיחָה; זָרַק נַמִי הֲוָה לֵיהּ כְּעֵין זְרִיקָה! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: בָּעֵינָא זְרִיקָה מִשְׁתַּבֶּרֶת וְלֵיכָּא.

§ Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: In the case of an object of idol worship that is worshipped by means of a stick, e.g., by beating a stick on another object in order to produce noise, if one broke a stick before it, he is liable. If he threw a stick before it, he is exempt. Abaye said to Rava: What is different about the case where one broke a stick? In this case one is liable because it is similar to slaughtering an offering, which is a rite performed in the Temple; so too, in the case where one threw a stick, it is similar to the sprinkling of the blood on the altar. Rava said to Abaye: In order for a sacrificial rite to be similar to the sprinkling of blood, I require a form of throwing that scatters the offering, and that is not the case here.

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ: סָפַת לָהּ צוֹאָה, אוֹ שֶׁנִּסֵּךְ לְפָנֶיהָ עָבִיט שֶׁל מֵימֵי רַגְלַיִם

Abaye raised an objection to Rava’s explanation from a baraita : One who fed [ safat ] an idol excrement, or who poured a chamber pot of urine before it as a libation,